"This proposed rule change is further evidence that the Obama Administration stands firmly behind marriage equality."
The Human Rights Campaign (HRC), the nation’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization, praised the news that the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have proposed new regulations implementing the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges.
According to the Treasury Department, the proposed regulations will clarify “that a marriage of two individuals, whether of the same sex or the opposite sex, will be recognized for federal tax purposes if that marriage is recognized by any state, possession, or territory of the United States. The proposed regulations would also interpret the terms ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ to include same-sex spouses as well as opposite-sex spouses.”
“This proposed rule change is further evidence that the Obama Administration stands firmly behind marriage equality,” said HRC Government Affairs Director David Stacy. “With this straightforward proposed change, the Treasury Department is making clear that for federal tax purposes all legally married couples will be treated equally in the eyes of the law.”
In 2013 following the Supreme Court’s historic decision in United States v. Windsor, the IRS clarified that same-sex couples legally married in jurisdictions that authorize same-sex marriage would be treated equally for federal tax purposes.
According to the Treasury Department, today’s newly proposed regulations clarify and strengthen that guidance further by “reflecting that same-sex couples can now marry in all states and that all states will recognize these marriages.
The proposed regulations will apply to all federal tax provisions where marriage is a factor, including filing status, claiming personal and dependency exemptions, taking the standard deduction, employee benefits, contributing to an IRA, and claiming the earned income tax credit or child tax credit.”
The IRS 2013 revenue ruling reflected the Obama Administration’s broad implementation of the Supreme Court’s previous marriage equality decision in the Windsor case. However, there were a few federal areas – such as social security benefits, veterans benefits, and copyright ownership – in which married same-sex couples in non-marriage equality states remained at risk due to discriminatory language in the statutes governing those areas. These barriers to equality were resolved with the Supreme Court’s decision affirming a constitutional right to nationwide marriage equality in the Obergefell case.
Discuss: Do you agree, disagree, or want to add an opinion on this topic - Click Here to comment and/or discuss.
96,000 Same-sex Couples Married Since U.S. Supreme Court Decision - Same-sex American couples who have tied the knot account for 11 percent of all summer weddings
Marriage Equality - Proposed Rule Change by Treasury Department - Proposed regulations further clarify federal tax code relating to marriage to be inclusive of same-sex spouses
Carly Fiorina Denies Own Words on Marriage Equality - Carly Fiorina has attempted to deny her words suggesting Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v Hodges, the case that led to nationwide marriage equality is the law of the land
Albuquerque Ranked Top Place for Gender Equality - U.S. metros ranked by how far women have come to achieving gender equality with regard to owning a home, attending college and getting paid
Call on Trump Administration to Reinstate Sexual Orientation Question in National Senior Survey - HRC criticizes Trump Administration for removing question about sexual orientation from National Survey of Older Americans Act Participants (NSOAAP)
Trump Administration Proposes to End Data Collection on LGBT Elders and People with Disabilities - Proposed removal of sexual orientation question from National Survey of Older Americans Act Participants and sexual orientation and gender identity fields