"SAGE is a leading international publisher of journals, books, and electronic media for academic, educational, and professional markets"
Research has revealed that gender biases limit the opportunities for women within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. But just how prevalent are these biases and how are they perceived differently by men and women? A new study out today in Psychology of Women Quarterly examined a well-known space for candid sharing of thoughts - the comments sections of online articles - and found that men are much less likely to agree with scientific evidence of gender bias in STEM than women.
Researchers Corinne Moss-Racusin, Aneta Molenda, and Charlotte Cramer analyzed 831 public comments made on three online news articles (from the New York Times, Discover Magazine Blog, and the IFL Science blog) that reported experimental evidence of gender bias within some areas of scientists.
They found that men were more likely to respond negatively to these articles than women. Specifically:
The researchers also studied any sexist remarks made by men and women in the comments:
The authors wrote, "It is critical to understand how people react to evidence of bias in order to implement successful interventions designed to decrease it, particularly given mounting evidence that non-stigmatized group members (i.e., White men) may respond differently than other individuals."
Find out more by reading the full article, "Can Evidence Impact Attitudes? Public Reactions to Evidence of Gender Bias in STEM Fields." For an embargoed copy of the full text, email email@example.com
Psychology of Women Quarterly (PWQ) is a feminist, scientific, peer-reviewed journal that publishes empirical research, critical reviews and theoretical articles that advance a field of inquiry, brief reports on timely topics, teaching briefs, and invited book reviews related to the psychology of women and gender.
Impact Factor: 1.907
Ranked: 1 out of 39 in Women's Studies and 34 out of 127 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary
Source: 2013 Journal Citation Reports® (Thomson Reuters, 2014)
SAGE is a leading international publisher of journals, books, and electronic media for academic, educational, and professional markets. Since 1965, SAGE has helped inform and educate a global community of scholars, practitioners, researchers, and students spanning a wide range of subject areas including business, humanities, social sciences, and science, technology, and medicine. An independent company, SAGE has principal offices in Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore and Washington DC. http://www.sagepublications.com
Discuss: Do you agree, disagree, or want to add an opinion on this topic - Click Here to comment.
Do Ugly People Get Paid Less - Research finds healthier intelligent people, those with more conscientious, more extraverted, and less neurotic personality traits take home bigger pay checks
Couples Becoming Intrigued by BDSM Lifestyle - Introductory course for women and couples interested in exploring the world of erotic domination and submission, and kinky and fetish oriented sex lives
Sex Inclusion in Biomedical Research - Scientists from Northwestern Medicine community celebrate anniversary National Institutes of Health (NIH) landmark sex-inclusion policy
No Difference in Outcomes Among Children Raised by Same-Sex and Different-Sex Parent Families - Study compared same-sex and different-sex parent households on child psychological well-being, parenting stress, and parents use of informal and formal support in child rearing
Guidance Protecting Transgender Youth and Young Adults From Discrimination Fact Sheet - Williams Institute fact sheet regarding U.S. Departments of Education and Justice withdrawal of legal guidance protecting transgender youth and young adults from discrimination in education
LGBTQ Advocates Condemn Shameful HB2.0 Proposal - New proposal introduced by Republican State Representative Chuck McGrady would prevent cities from passing meaningful non-discrimination protections