Author: Northwestern University
Author Contact: northwestern.edu
Published: 6th Mar 2023
Peer-Reviewed Publication: Yes
Additional References: Discrimination and Abuse Publications
Summary: Study explores stigmatizing behaviors expressed by avid supporters of sexual minorities in a survey 8.5% who said they were fully accepting of gay people did not want gay neighbors.
Social stigma is the disapproval of, or discrimination against, an individual or group based on perceived characteristics that distinguish them from other members of society. Social stigmas are commonly related to culture, gender, race, socioeconomic class, age, sexual orientation, body image, physical disability, intelligence or lack thereof, and health.
From the perspective of the stigmatizer, stigmatization involves threat, aversion, and sometimes the depersonalization of others into stereotypic caricatures.
The stigmatized are ostracized, devalued, scorned, shunned, and ignored. Those who perceive themselves as members of a stigmatized group, whether it is apparent to those around them or not, often experience psychological distress, and many view themselves contemptuously.
Superficial Allies: The Role of Legal Inclusion and Social Obedience in Stigma Processes - Sociological Research Online.
When legal systems offer no protections to sexual minorities, even avid LGBTQ supporters would reject their gay neighbors, reports a new Northwestern Medicine study. The study examined "superficial allies," or those who express full support for sexual minorities while refusing neighboring proximity to them. The researchers found the absence of legal recognition and protection for sexual minorities at the national level increases sexual prejudice among both allies and stigmatizes.
The research is the first to explore stigmatizing behaviors of people who fully accept homosexuality. Previous research focused solely on people who reject homosexuality.
"While the power of legal exclusion in stigmatization is undeniable, its impact on ally behavior has never been explored," said author Shahin Davoudpour, a postdoctoral research fellow in the department of medical social sciences at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
"Everything we know from research is about the stigmatizing group," Davoudpour said. "For example, in popular news, the rhetoric focuses on homophobic parents who become allies upon discovering their child is gay. What we don't ever hear about is the opposite of this: You're supportive of them, but once they come out, then you no longer want to be neighbors, colleagues or even friends. The dynamic behind this inconsistency between acceptance and inclusion is what I study."
The study was recently published in the journal Sociological Research Online.
Legal inclusion is the degree to which a society's legal institutions recognize and protect one's identity. It can play a powerful role in the reduction of stigma, even among allies, Davoudpour said.
The large, survey-based study examined data from 113 countries with varying degrees of legal inclusion for sexual minorities.
"The more legal protection that existed, the less likely people were to reject association with homosexual neighbors in both stigmatizer and ally groups," he said.
In the study, 545,531 survey respondents stated their sexual prejudice by choosing between 1 and 10, with 1 being "non-accepting of homosexuals" and 10 being "fully accepting."
Of the 55,523 respondents who rated themselves as a 10 (or "fully accepting"), 4,714 respondents (8.5%) said they did not want a homosexual neighbor.
"Even though structural change is much slower than individual-level intervention, Dr. Davoudpour's study clearly demonstrates the impact of policy change (and sustained change) on improving the acceptance of minoritized individuals," said Gregory Phillips II, assistant professor of medical social sciences and preventive medicine at Feinberg.
In the past 50 to 60 years of stigma research, Davoudpour said once a society achieves acceptance of a minority group, it tends to forget to fight for that group's legal rights and inclusion. But he said, based on these findings, this is the wrong approach because these "accepting" groups might still refuse to fully integrate with the stigmatized group.
"We always talk about the people in the middle who can be swayed either way, but we believe the 'fully accepting' have dug in their heels, wearing their ally t-shirt proudly," Davoudpour said. "What I say is that when legal protection for the stigmatized is removed, they have the potential to become stigmatizers. This study shows how allies need certain social and legal infrastructure to flourish into stronger supporters and genuine advocates."
Davoudpour said a recent example of this is when Pope Francis said, "Being homosexual isn't a crime," but likened it to a "sin."
"This started to get mocked, with people saying, 'It's not a crime, but I still go to Hell?' But I believe that's not true," Davoudpour said. "If we change the law to include and protect the stigmatized, even if their rhetoric says it's a 'sin,' we can mobilize the accepting group to their fullest potential. That's how meaningful change will come about, that's the key message."
Superficial allies might be afraid of "courtesy stigma" (stigma by association) when there is no legal protection for sexual minorities, Davoudpour said. For instance, it's easier to be mistakenly associated with groups with invisible stigmas, such as HIV status or sexual orientation, versus those with visible stigmas, such as race, gender, skin color, etc.
"In absence of legal protection, these fully accepting people might think they can be rejected if they hang out in proximity of gay people," Davoudpour said. "Perhaps, they are using this as some sort of defense mechanism. 'I can't be seen with you because I might get fired. If I don't punish you, they will punish me.'"
Some LGBT Allies Don't Want Gay Neighbors | Northwestern University (northwestern.edu). SexualDiversity.org makes no warranties or representations in connection therewith. Content may have been edited for style, clarity or length.
Post to Twitter Add to Facebook
| Latest Discrimination and Abuse Publications | |
|---|---|
The above information is from our reference library of resources relating to Discrimination and Abuse that includes: | |
 | Language in Sexual Offense Judgments Makes Victims Responsible Judgments are supposed to reflect objectivity of the courts, but when we use language we inevitably express some kind of idea or conception of the world. Publish Date: 19th Sep 2024 |
| Lack of Sexually Injuries Does Not Mean Rape Victim Is Making It Up A new study reveals the absence of sexually related injuries cannot be used in court to infer that rape victims are making it up. Publish Date: 8th Oct 2023 |
| Why Sexually Harassed People Might Not Come Forward Immediately or at All What would a reasonable person do? Exploring the gap between experienced and anticipated responses to sexual harassment. Publish Date: 10th Jun 2023 |
| Some LGBT Allies Don't Want Gay Neighbors Study explores stigmatizing behaviors expressed by avid supporters of sexual minorities in a survey 8.5% who said they were fully accepting of gay people did not want gay neighbors. Publish Date: 6th Mar 2023 |
1Transgender Reporting Guide
How to write about transgender people.
2Am I Gay? Questions to Ask
Think you may be gay or bisexual?
3Glossary of Sexuality Terms
Definitions of sexual terms & acronyms.
4LGBTQ+ Pride Flags
Symbols of Identity and Inclusion.
5LGBT Awareness Dates
Important LGBTQ community awareness days, remembrance dates, and coming pride events.
• Submissions: Send us your coming events and LGBTQ related news stories.
• Report Errors: Please report outdated or inaccurate information to us.
• (APA): Northwestern University. (2023, March 6). Some LGBT Allies Don't Want Gay Neighbors. SexualDiversity.org. Retrieved October 16, 2024 from www.sexualdiversity.org/discrimination/1153.php
• Permalink: <a href="https://www.sexualdiversity.org/discrimination/1153.php">Some LGBT Allies Don't Want Gay Neighbors</a>