Author: The Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law
Published: Friday 31st July 2020 - Updated: Sunday 2nd August 2020
Summary: LGBT people could gain additional non-discrimination protections if U.S. courts interpret state laws consistent with Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County.
A new report by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law finds that millions of LGBT people could gain additional non-discrimination protections if courts interpret state laws consistent with the Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County.
In Bostock, the Court held that employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Courts have often looked to Title VII case law when interpreting similar provisions in other federal and state laws that apply to housing, public accommodations, education, and other settings.
In the current study, researchers analyzed state sex non-discrimination laws in states without statutes that expressly bar discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. They also estimated the number of LGBT people in each state who stand to gain protections under these laws.
"State laws remain an important source of protection for LGBT people even though Bostock guarantees federal protections in employment," said lead author Christy Mallory, the Legal Director at the Williams Institute. "Many state non-discrimination laws are broader in scope than Title VII, and many of them protect people from discrimination based on sex in settings where federal law does not, such as public accommodations."
27 states have laws that prohibit employment discrimination based on sex, but do not expressly cover both sexual orientation and gender identity.
26 states have laws that prohibit housing discrimination based on sex, but do not expressly cover both sexual orientation and gender identity.
23 states have laws that prohibit public accommodations discrimination based on sex, but not based on both sexual orientation and gender identity. These laws are particularly important because federal law does not prohibit sex discrimination in public accommodations.
14 states have laws that prohibit education discrimination based on sex, but do not expressly cover both sexual orientation and gender identity.
15 states have laws that prohibit credit discrimination based on sex, but do not expressly cover either sexual orientation or gender identity.
"There are six states in the country where LGBT people stand to gain comprehensive state-level protections, as these states already have laws that expressly prohibit discrimination based on sex, but not sexual orientation and gender identity, in all five of the settings we analyzed," said co-author Luis A. Vasquez, the Renberg Law Fellow at the Williams Institute. "These states include Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Montana, North Dakota, and Wisconsin."
Report: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/state-nd-laws-after-bostock/
From our Discrimination section - Full List (42 Items)
Send us your coming events and LGBTQ related news stories.
1.3 Million Adult Immigrants in the US Identify as LGBT
Diversity in the Television Sector
LGBT Community Connectedness Differences Between LGB Republicans and LGB Democrats
Black Men and Sexual Minority Men Overrepresented in U.S. Among Commited Sex Offenders
Over Five Million LGBT Adults in the U.S. are Religious
Canada Reintroduces Legislation to Criminalize Conversion Therapy Related Conduct
No Difference in Health Outcomes for Transgender and Cisgender Parents
"Storytellers are powerful and we are all storytellers," suggests Tsara Shelton, author of the book Spinning in Circles and Learning from Myself: A Collection of Stories that Slowly Grow Up..
LGBT Awareness & Events
List of important LGBT awareness dates and coming sexual diversity events.