LGBT People Could Gain Additional Protections from Discrimination After Bostock

Author: The Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law
Published: 31st Jul 2020 - Updated: 2nd Aug 2020
Peer-Reviewed Publication: N/A
Additional References: Discrimination and Abuse Publications

Summary: LGBT people could gain additional non-discrimination protections if U.S. courts interpret state laws consistent with Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County.

Main Document

A new report by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law finds that millions of LGBT people could gain additional non-discrimination protections if courts interpret state laws consistent with the Supreme Court's ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County.

In Bostock, the Court held that employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity is a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Courts have often looked to Title VII case law when interpreting similar provisions in other federal and state laws that apply to housing, public accommodations, education, and other settings.

In the current study, researchers analyzed state sex non-discrimination laws in states without statutes that expressly bar discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. They also estimated the number of LGBT people in each state who stand to gain protections under these laws.

"State laws remain an important source of protection for LGBT people even though Bostock guarantees federal protections in employment," said lead author Christy Mallory, the Legal Director at the Williams Institute. "Many state non-discrimination laws are broader in scope than Title VII, and many of them protect people from discrimination based on sex in settings where federal law does not, such as public accommodations."

Key Findings

Employment:

27 states have laws that prohibit employment discrimination based on sex, but do not expressly cover both sexual orientation and gender identity.

• An additional 3.6 million LGBT employees would gain protections from employment discrimination under state laws if they are interpreted consistent with Bostock.
• Eighteen of these states' laws apply to smaller employers than Title VII does. LGBT employees for these small employers, who are not covered under Title VII, will gain legal protections from discrimination if these laws are interpreted consistent with Bostock.
• Four states' laws offer more robust remedies than Title VII, potentially allowing employees to recover higher monetary damages than they could through a suit brought under federal law.

Housing:

26 states have laws that prohibit housing discrimination based on sex, but do not expressly cover both sexual orientation and gender identity.

• An additional 5.2 million LGBT adults would gain protections from housing discrimination under state laws if they are interpreted consistent with Bostock.

Public Accommodations:

23 states have laws that prohibit public accommodations discrimination based on sex, but not based on both sexual orientation and gender identity. These laws are particularly important because federal law does not prohibit sex discrimination in public accommodations.

• An additional 4.3 million LGBT people age 13 and older would gain protections from public accommodations discrimination under these state laws if they are interpreted consistent with Bostock.

Education:

14 states have laws that prohibit education discrimination based on sex, but do not expressly cover both sexual orientation and gender identity.

• An additional 790,000 LGBT students age 15 and older could gain protections from education discrimination under these state laws if they are interpreted consistent with Bostock.

Credit:

15 states have laws that prohibit credit discrimination based on sex, but do not expressly cover either sexual orientation or gender identity.

• An additional 2.5 million LGBT adults could gain protections from credit discrimination under these state laws if they are interpreted consistent with Bostock.

"There are six states in the country where LGBT people stand to gain comprehensive state-level protections, as these states already have laws that expressly prohibit discrimination based on sex, but not sexual orientation and gender identity, in all five of the settings we analyzed," said co-author Luis A. Vasquez, the Renberg Law Fellow at the Williams Institute. "These states include Alaska, Indiana, Kentucky, Montana, North Dakota, and Wisconsin."

Report: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/state-nd-laws-after-bostock/

Post to Twitter Add to Facebook

Latest Discrimination and Abuse Publications
The above information is from our reference library of resources relating to Discrimination and Abuse that includes:
	Language in Sexual Offense Judgments Makes Victims Responsible Judgments are supposed to reflect objectivity of the courts, but when we use language we inevitably express some kind of idea or conception of the world. Publish Date: 19th Sep 2024
	Lack of Sexually Injuries Does Not Mean Rape Victim Is Making It Up A new study reveals the absence of sexually related injuries cannot be used in court to infer that rape victims are making it up. Publish Date: 8th Oct 2023
	Why Sexually Harassed People Might Not Come Forward Immediately or at All What would a reasonable person do? Exploring the gap between experienced and anticipated responses to sexual harassment. Publish Date: 10th Jun 2023
	Some LGBT Allies Don't Want Gay Neighbors Study explores stigmatizing behaviors expressed by avid supporters of sexual minorities in a survey 8.5% who said they were fully accepting of gay people did not want gay neighbors. Publish Date: 6th Mar 2023