Screen Readers Skip to Content

Gender Inequality Among Scientific Editors

Author: New York University
Author Contact: nyu.edu
Published: 16th Jan 2023
Peer-Reviewed Publication: Yes
Additional References: Gender Equality Publications

Summary: Women are consistently underrepresented among editors, and female editors are less likely to publish their research in the journals they edit.

Definition

Gender Inequality

Gender inequality is the social phenomenon in which men and women are not treated equally. The treatment may arise from distinctions regarding biology, psychology, or cultural norms prevalent in society. Some of these distinctions are empirically grounded, while others appear as social constructs. Gender inequality is experienced differently across different cultures and also affects non-binary people. Worldwide, nearly 1 in 4 girls between the ages of 15 and 19 are neither employed nor in education or training - compared to 1 in 10 boys. Gender equality is a fundamental human right and that right is violated by gender-based discrimination.

Main Document

Gender Inequality and Self-Publication are Common Among Academic Editors - Nature Human Behaviour.

To determine the representation of women among scientific journal editors - key players in the scientific community who have the final say about what papers get published - a team led by NYU Abu Dhabi (NYUAD) researchers has completed the largest study to date of systemic gender inequality in editorial boards over the past five decades. Since scientific editors shape the content of academic journals and set standards for their fields, gender disparity can influence opportunities for women to publish in these journals, receive recognition for their research, and advance their careers.

The NYUAD researchers and their colleagues studied the gender composition of editorial boards across fifteen disciplines and the rate at which editors publish their research in the journals they oversee. They found that women have been consistently underrepresented on editorial boards across disciplines, and editors could publish up to 70 percent of their papers in the journals they edit while continuing to serve as editors. However, women were found to be less likely to publish their work in their journals.

In the paper titled Gender inequality and self-publication are common among academic editors published in the journal Nature Human Behaviour, the NYUAD researchers used algorithmic tools to infer the gender of 81,000 editors serving more than 1,000 journals and 15 disciplines over five decades and found that only 26 percent of authors in the data set were women. Even fewer women were editors (14 percent) or editors-in-chief (eight percent).

While being the gatekeepers of science, editors actively seek opportunities to publish. The vast majority of editors are research-active academics who perform editorial duties in addition to their research activities.

By analyzing the publication records of 20,000 editors, the researchers found that 12 percent publish at least one-fifth, and six percent publish at least one-third, of their papers in the journal they edit.

Editors-in-chief tend to self-publish at a higher rate; it was found that 19 percent self-publish at least one-fifth of their papers, and 11 percent self-publish one-third of their papers.

Finally, compared to women, men have a higher increase in the rate at which they publish in a journal soon after becoming its editor.

While gender disparity has often been measured in terms of citation count, paper count, and career length, this study has shown that, at least for editors-in-chief, gender disparity goes beyond what is predicted by these numbers. Editors are highly influential and can choose to foster a more inclusive scientific community by selecting papers transparently and can encourage a more inclusive editorial board by recruiting board members from underrepresented groups. Therefore, diversity and representation amongst editors are critical.

"The editors of scientific journals hold tremendous power in their fields, directly influencing what research - and which researchers - are elevated. Unfortunately, not all scientists have an equal opportunity to hold these positions. Our study shows that, despite efforts to increase the representation of women in all aspects of the scientific workforce, including editorial leadership positions in journals, it is clear that women are still significantly underrepresented in positions of power," said Associate Professor of Computer Science Talal Rahwan.

Assistant Professor of Computational Social Science Bedoor AlShebli - Image Courtesy of NYU Abu Dhabi.Assistant Professor of Computational Social Science Bedoor AlShebli - Image Courtesy of NYU Abu Dhabi.

Assistant Professor of Computational Social Science Bedoor AlShebli added:

"This study also indicates the systematic prevalence of non-meritocratic factors in selecting editors-in-chief that work against women. Our findings align with past findings that women face additional obstacles in being recognized as elite scientists in their respective disciplines. Future research will be necessary to pinpoint the underlying mechanisms behind these findings further and contribute to a fairer, more transparent, and more inclusive culture of scientific editorship."

Also See:

References and Source(s):

Gender Inequality Among Scientific Editors | New York University (nyu.edu). SexualDiversity.org makes no warranties or representations in connection therewith. Content may have been edited for style, clarity or length.

Post to Twitter Add to Facebook

Latest Gender Equality Publications

The above information is from our reference library of resources relating to Gender Equality that includes:

Thumbnail image: Assistant Professor of Computational Social Science Bedoor AlShebli - Image Courtesy of NYU Abu Dhabi.
Women are consistently underrepresented among editors, and female editors are less likely to publish their research in the journals they edit.
Publish Date: 16th Jan 2023

Bias against men in health care, early education, and domestic (HEED) fields have been documented, and the current study sought to gauge the impact of that bias.
Publish Date: 24th Dec 2022
Thumbnail image: gender-bias.jpg
Many internet algorithms are based on stereotypes, leading them to associate the sciences with masculinity and the arts with femininity.
Publish Date: 24th Nov 2022 - Updated: 5th Jan 2023
Thumbnail image: The shift to remote working in March 2020 caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has raised many questions on the future of work. A new report looks at who has benefited from remote and hybrid work models and what organizations and governments can do to ensure those currently disadvantaged by the current models can also benefit - Image Credit: Institute for Gender and the Economy, Rotman School of Management.
A new report from Institute for Gender and the Economy looks at remote work, the pursuit of equality, and the future of work.
Publish Date: 10th Nov 2022


1LGBTQ+ Awareness and Events
LGBTQ+ awareness dates and events.

2Transgender Reporting Guide
How to write about transgender people.

3Glossary of Sexuality Terms
Definitions of sexual terms & acronyms.

4Glossary of Gender Terms
Definitions of gender related terms.

5Am I Gay? Questions to Ask
Think you may be gay or bisexual?

• Submissions: Send us your coming events and LGBTQ related news stories.


• Report Errors: Please report outdated or inaccurate information to us.



• (APA): New York University. (2023, January 16). Gender Inequality Among Scientific Editors. SexualDiversity.org. Retrieved January 30, 2023 from www.sexualdiversity.org/discrimination/equality/1125.php


• Permalink: <a href="https://www.sexualdiversity.org/discrimination/equality/1125.php">Gender Inequality Among Scientific Editors</a>