Author: University of California - Riverside
Author Contact: ucr.edu
Published: 2nd Oct 2022 - Updated: 5th Jan 2023
Peer-Reviewed Publication: Yes
Additional References: LGBTQ+ News Publications
Summary: The study suggests that outgroup preference does not necessarily reflect negative feelings about the ingroup as much as it reflects positive feelings about the outgroup.
Implicit bias, or implicit stereotype, was first defined by psychologists Mahzarin Banaji and Anthony Greenwald in 1995 and is a form of bias that occurs automatically and unintentionally that nevertheless affects judgments, decisions, and behaviors. Bias consists of attitudes, behaviors, and actions that are prejudiced in favor of or against one person or group compared to another. In many cases, people can hold positive or negative associations about their own race, gender, religion, sexuality, or other personal characteristics. Research has shown implicit bias can pose a barrier to recruiting and retaining a diverse scientific workforce as implicit biases operate almost entirely unconsciously. While explicit biases and prejudices are intentional and controllable, implicit biases are less so. Implicit bias means we're all probably at least a little racist and is sometimes referred to as "the new diversity paradigm - one that recognizes the role that bias plays in the day-to-day functioning of all human beings."
The contributions of positive outgroup and negative ingroup evaluation to implicit bias favoring outgroups.
More than 70 years ago, a pair of psychologists conducted a study asking young Black girls to choose between Black and white dolls. The girls overwhelmingly chose white dolls, ascribing positive attributes to them.
The Black girls' choices and reasoning were interpreted by study authors to indicate "a feeling of inferiority among African-American children and damaged... self-esteem."
The die was cast in psychology discourse: If you like a group to which you don't belong - an "outgroup" - it's because you have bad feelings about your own group - your "ingroup."
A UC Riverside study involving more than 879,000 participants published this week challenges the assumption that liking an outgroup means disliking your ingroup.
"Our findings suggest that outgroup preference does not necessarily reflect negative feelings about the ingroup as much as it reflects positive feelings about the outgroup," said Jimmy Calanchini, an assistant professor of psychology at UC Riverside and lead author of the study.
In the 1940s study, psychologists Kenneth and Mamie Clark used four dolls, identical except for color, and asked young Black girls questions such as which doll they would play with and which was "the nice doll." The girls chose the white dolls, leading the researchers to famously conclude that a Black child by age 5 is aware that "to be colored in... American society is a mark of inferior status." The study was subsequently used as supporting evidence in the 1954 landmark desegregation ruling Brown v. Board of Education.
Calanchini's study focused on measures of implicit bias. Whereas explicit bias is expressed directly - for example, "I think this group is superior to that group" - implicit bias is measured indirectly.
Calanchini measured implicit bias with the Implicit Association Test, or IAT, a computerized task in which participants sort words related to ingroups and outgroups and pleasant and unpleasant concepts. If a participant responds more quickly and accurately to some word pairings than others - for example, ingroup-good versus ingroup-bad - it suggests that the faster/more accurate responses are more strongly connected in the participant's mind.
The study was administered through Internet-based sites to 879,000 volunteers, plus undergraduates at the University of California, Davis. The IATs measured implicit bias in the contexts of race - Black, white, and Asian; sexual preference - straight vs. gay; and age - young vs. old.
Among members of minority or relatively lower-status groups - Asian people, Black people, homosexual people, older people - who showed implicit bias in favor of a higher-status outgroup, they consistently showed more positive evaluations of the outgroup than they did negative evaluations of their own group. The researchers found the same pattern among members of majority or relatively higher-status groups - white people, straight people, younger people - who showed implicit bias in favor of their own ingroup. Their liking of the ingroup showed more positive evaluations of the ingroup than negative evaluations of the outgroup.
"Whenever people like a higher-status group, it's not necessarily at the expense of the lower-status group," Calanchini concluded.
Calanchini surmises one possible reason is favorable representations of high-status groups in culture, like movies and politics.
There was an exception to the finding that one can like an outgroup without feeling negatively toward one's ingroup. White and young people who showed implicit bias in favor of other races or older people were more likely to have negative feelings about their ingroups.
The study, "The Contributions of Positive Outgroup and Negative Ingroup Evaluation to Implicit Bias Favoring Outgroups," is published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, or PNAS.
Co-authors include: Kathleen Schmidt, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, and Jeffrey Sherman and Samuel Klein, both of University of California, Davis.
Liking a Different Group Does Not Mean You Dislike Your Own | University of California - Riverside (ucr.edu). SexualDiversity.org makes no warranties or representations in connection therewith. Content may have been edited for style, clarity or length.
Post to Twitter Add to Facebook
| Latest LGBTQ+ News Publications | |
|---|---|
The above information is from our reference library of resources relating to LGBTQ+ News that includes: | |
 | Increased Adoption of They/Them Pronouns Research paper provides the first evidence of how people use they or them when talking about a specific person in a spoken storytelling context. Publish Date: 19th Apr 2024 - Updated: 24th Jun 2024 |
 | Exploring Sex and Gender in Science - Cell Cell issue on sex and gender in science includes a collection of articles on topics related to strategies for promoting gender equality in academia, enhancing rigor in the study of sex-related variables, and supporting transgender researchers. Publish Date: 14th Mar 2024 - Updated: 25th Jun 2024 |
| Today's Problematic Use of Pornography International study reveals how problematic use of pornography is affecting people in different parts of the world, across various genders and sexual orientations. Publish Date: 5th Mar 2024 |
| Gender-Affirming Care Bans Carry Significant Penalties for Physicians State laws and policies banning gender-affirming care for minors include a range of penalties for physicians that continue to provide care. Publish Date: 6th Jun 2023 |
1How Many Genders Are There?
Alphabetical list of gender identities.
2Transgender Reporting Guide
How to write about transgender people.
3Glossary of Sexuality Terms
Definitions of sexual terms & acronyms.
4Glossary of Sexual Identities
Definitions of gender related terms.
5Am I Gay? Questions to Ask
Think you may be gay or bisexual?
• Submissions: Send us your coming events and LGBTQ related news stories.
• Report Errors: Please report outdated or inaccurate information to us.
• (APA): University of California - Riverside. (2022, October 2). Liking a Different Group Does Not Mean You Dislike Your Own. SexualDiversity.org. Retrieved October 4, 2024 from www.sexualdiversity.org/news/1033.php
• Permalink: <a href="https://www.sexualdiversity.org/news/1033.php">Liking a Different Group Does Not Mean You Dislike Your Own</a>