Screen Readers Skip to Content

Study Finds Gender and Skin-type Bias in Commercial AI Systems

Author: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Published: 12th Feb 2018
Peer-Reviewed Publication: N/A
Additional References: LGBTQ+ News Publications

Summary: Examination of facial-analysis software shows error rate of 0.8 percent for light-skinned men, 34.7 percent for dark-skinned women.


Main Document

Study finds gender and skin-type bias in commercial artificial-intelligence systems - Examination of facial-analysis software shows error rate of 0.8 percent for light-skinned men, 34.7 percent for dark-skinned women.

Three commercially released facial-analysis programs from major technology companies demonstrate both skin-type and gender biases, according to a new paper researchers from MIT and Stanford University will present later this month at the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.

In the researchers' experiments, the three programs' error rates in determining the gender of light-skinned men were never worse than 0.8 percent. For darker-skinned women, however, the error rates ballooned - to more than 20 percent in one case and more than 34 percent in the other two.

The findings raise questions about how today's neural networks, which learn to perform computational tasks by looking for patterns in huge data sets, are trained and evaluated. For instance, according to the paper, researchers at a major U.S. technology company claimed an accuracy rate of more than 97 percent for a face-recognition system they'd designed. But the data set used to assess its performance was more than 77 percent male and more than 83 percent white.

"What's really important here is the method and how that method applies to other applications," says Joy Buolamwini, a researcher in the MIT Media Lab's Civic Media group and first author on the new paper. "The same data-centric techniques that can be used to try to determine somebody's gender are also used to identify a person when you're looking for a criminal suspect or to unlock your phone. And it's not just about computer vision. I'm really hopeful that this will spur more work into looking at [other] disparities."

Buolamwini is joined on the paper by Timnit Gebru, who was a graduate student at Stanford when the work was done and is now a postdoc at Microsoft Research.

Chance Discoveries

(Article continues below image.)

This is Joy Buolamwini, a researcher in the MIT Media Lab's Civic Media group - Photo Credit: Bryce Vickmark.This is Joy Buolamwini, a researcher in the MIT Media Lab's Civic Media group - Photo Credit: Bryce Vickmark.

(Continued...)

The three programs that Buolamwini and Gebru investigated were general-purpose facial-analysis systems, which could be used to match faces in different photos as well as to assess characteristics such as gender, age, and mood. All three systems treated gender classification as a binary decision - male or female - which made their performance on that task particularly easy to assess statistically. But the same types of bias probably afflict the programs' performance on other tasks, too.

Indeed, it was the chance discovery of apparent bias in face-tracking by one of the programs that prompted Buolamwini's investigation in the first place.

Several years ago, as a graduate student at the Media Lab, Buolamwini was working on a system she called Upbeat Walls, an interactive, multimedia art installation that allowed users to control colorful patterns projected on a reflective surface by moving their heads. To track the user's movements, the system used a commercial facial-analysis program.

The team that Buolamwini assembled to work on the project was ethnically diverse, but the researchers found that, when it came time to present the device in public, they had to rely on one of the lighter-skinned team members to demonstrate it. The system just didn't seem to work reliably with darker-skinned users.

Curious, Buolamwini, who is black, began submitting photos of herself to commercial facial-recognition programs. In several cases, the programs failed to recognize the photos as featuring a human face at all. When they did, they consistently misclassified Buolamwini's gender.

Quantitative Standards

To begin investigating the programs' biases systematically, Buolamwini first assembled a set of images in which women and people with dark skin are much better-represented than they are in the data sets typically used to evaluate face-analysis systems. The final set contained more than 1,200 images.

Next, she worked with a dermatologic surgeon to code the images according to the Fitzpatrick scale of skin tones, a six-point scale, from light to dark, originally developed by dermatologists as a means of assessing risk of sunburn.

Then she applied three commercial facial-analysis systems from major technology companies to her newly constructed data set. Across all three, the error rates for gender classification were consistently higher for females than they were for males, and for darker-skinned subjects than for lighter-skinned subjects.

For darker-skinned women - those assigned scores of IV, V, or VI on the Fitzpatrick scale - the error rates were 20.8 percent, 34.5 percent, and 34.7. But with two of the systems, the error rates for the darkest-skinned women in the data set - those assigned a score of VI - were worse still: 46.5 percent and 46.8 percent. Essentially, for those women, the system might as well have been guessing gender at random.

"To fail on one in three, in a commercial system, on something that's been reduced to a binary classification task, you have to ask, would that have been permitted if those failure rates were in a different subgroup?" Buolamwini says. "The other big lesson ... is that our benchmarks, the standards by which we measure success, themselves can give us a false sense of progress."

Post to Twitter Add to Facebook

Latest LGBTQ+ News Publications

The above information is from our reference library of resources relating to LGBTQ+ News that includes:

Increased Adoption of They/Them Pronouns thumbnail image.
Research paper provides the first evidence of how people use they or them when talking about a specific person in a spoken storytelling context.
Publish Date: 19th Apr 2024
This image depicts the cover of Cell's focus issue on sex and gender. thumbnail image
Cell issue on sex and gender in science includes a collection of articles on topics related to strategies for promoting gender equality in academia, enhancing rigor in the study of sex-related variables, and supporting transgender researchers.
Publish Date: 14th Mar 2024
Today's Problematic Use of Pornography thumbnail image.
International study reveals how problematic use of pornography is affecting people in different parts of the world, across various genders and sexual orientations.
Publish Date: 5th Mar 2024
Gender-Affirming Care Bans Carry Significant Penalties for Physicians thumbnail image.
State laws and policies banning gender-affirming care for minors include a range of penalties for physicians that continue to provide care.
Publish Date: 6th Jun 2023


1How Many Genders Are There?
Alphabetical list of gender identities.

2Transgender Reporting Guide
How to write about transgender people.

3Glossary of Sexuality Terms
Definitions of sexual terms & acronyms.

4Glossary of Sexual Identities
Definitions of gender related terms.

5Am I Gay? Questions to Ask
Think you may be gay or bisexual?

• Submissions: Send us your coming events and LGBTQ related news stories.


• Report Errors: Please report outdated or inaccurate information to us.



• (APA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (2018, February 12). Study Finds Gender and Skin-type Bias in Commercial AI Systems. SexualDiversity.org. Retrieved May 24, 2024 from www.sexualdiversity.org/news/866.php


• Permalink: <a href="https://www.sexualdiversity.org/news/866.php">Study Finds Gender and Skin-type Bias in Commercial AI Systems</a>